These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content test

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More


Photo Emerges Of Uvalde Police Armed In The School 1 Hour Before The Shooting

New images have emerged from the Uvalde school shooting, showing that at least three police officers were inside the building with high-capacity rifles and armor. Even as this evidence emerges, attorneys representing the Uvalde police scramble to block additional evidence indicating that officers not only failed to do their jobs but refused to do their jobs.

In the most damning image, we see a time stamp placing the photo 58 minutes earlier than the official response by Uvalde police. In that image, three officers are in a conjunction between two hallways. It shows them armed with AR-15s, (or better) ballistic shields, body armor, and a solid point of cover from which to operate.

According to all of the relevant reports, the time stamp of 11:52 AM placed these well positioned, fully armed, and armored police officers in the building during the rampage which killed 19 children and two teachers.

The evidence was already conclusive that the police were in the right place at the right time with the numbers and the equipment to stop Ramos, and that they willfully refused to do so. This new evidence shows beyond any reasonable doubt that the police chose to fail at their job when they had every resource on hand needed to succeed.

The photo was unearthed by the local news station KVUE and the Austin American Statesman on Monday the 20th of June. It is a still frame from the school surveillance camera. This means that there is video of the scene. That would be the material that attorneys representing the Uvalde sheriff’s office are trying to prevent being submitted as evidence.

In total, there were 19 officers on the scene, including the three we see in the image.

According to ZeroHedge.com, Col. Steven McCraw, director of the Texas Department of Public Safety stated, “There were 19 officers in there. In fact, there were more than enough officers to do what needed to be done, with the one exception of the incident commander inside who said he believed they needed more equipment and officers to perform a tactical breach at that point.”

That was the excuse not to move in from the hallway position shown in the photograph.

The city’s lawyer, Cynthia Trevino, said, “The City has not voluntarily released any information to any member of the public.”

Using this claim, the sheriff’s defense team will assert that the images were obtained illegally, in order to omit them from the admissible evidence.

What this could mean for the case is that the police may be exonerated despite the clear, convincing, and ample evidence of their guilt.

This will generate more distrust of our legal institutions, which is already exceedingly high.

8 thoughts on “Photo Emerges Of Uvalde Police Armed In The School 1 Hour Before The Shooting”

  1. Everytimea dem is in office there are a lot of shooting they are trying to get the second admendment maybe we should take their security away from them

  2. What a ploy! To release the photo underhandedly and then say it cannot be used as evidence, securing the “police” position. You all should be exeQted for your treasonous actions against America! …. especially the school children! Corruption is vastly deep and the accountability will be biblical. Military Tribunals for ALL OF THEM, FOLLOWED BY PUBLIC EXEQSHUNS!
    Bunch of shills …. “To Serve and Protect” pffffft …. yes, your own kind and agenda.

  3. As Veteran Senator Rogers put it- “Another Fed. boy summer” her thoughts may have some substance to them.
    How did the shooter buy a 70 $K truck & 9 $K worth of guns & ammo with a less than part time job? All just weeks before the incident. Where did the money come from ? Who/whom Paid it? How fat are the bank accounts of his mother, grandfather & family now? The entire incident stinks just Like Parkland did/does. Both shooters were Mexican & Cuban. NOT white. The New York Subway shooter – Frank James was a BLACK anti white RACIST. That news story quickly faded away.

  4. Been saying this for along time, they should pay for this themselves! What they have done to this society is a total atrocity. Time for them to have consequences for their own political actions. No sympathy here from most with commonsense!!

  5. If they take our protection, then we should take theirs. They are no more important than we are, they just think they are.

  6. Shootings conveniently occurring during election years, and using the most innocent, children, as the pawns to enact more totalitarian laws and restrictions. It is time for the citizens of our great nation to WAKE UP and get involved. Vote out the career politicians on both sides, ban lawyers from running for congressional offices, and enact mandatory term limits by public vote, because those in office never will.

  7. Hay! Got news for you: An AR does not have a third position for the fire selector. Also, we have looked everywhere except the one place which will present the truth: What happens when 100% of all the publicly available dispatch records for all nearby ambulance, fire and police are presented?

Comments are closed.


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More